My theory is "If the plain Dealer supports a side, vote the opposite" This , on average , is what voters should do. They are so biased toward the corporate elite that my premise is valid. All the projects they shove down the throat of everyone, Euclid Corridor and other projects of that ilk(Flats railway) Medical Marts, Convention Centers, that prove they are not economic engines but resource drains. I support gambling, but I feel that if the PD supports issue 3 there is an ulterior motive and will vote it down. The PD has been pushing issue 6 hard, the harder they push the more likely the worse it is. Thats what recent history tells us.
Submitted by Guest (not verified) on October 25, 2009 - 5:40pm.
My theory is "If the plain
My theory is "If the plain Dealer supports a side, vote the opposite" This , on average , is what voters should do. They are so biased toward the corporate elite that my premise is valid. All the projects they shove down the throat of everyone, Euclid Corridor and other projects of that ilk(Flats railway) Medical Marts, Convention Centers, that prove they are not economic engines but resource drains. I support gambling, but I feel that if the PD supports issue 3 there is an ulterior motive and will vote it down. The PD has been pushing issue 6 hard, the harder they push the more likely the worse it is. Thats what recent history tells us.