This prima donna asked Kerry why he conceded the 2004 Presidential election based on what was written in a book published in 2006. Since you thought it was a good question, I won't assume you'll notice the problem right away. I'll give you a hint, look at the dates.
From there, he makes a nice transition to asking why Kerry isn't pushing to impeach Bush. I'll try to answer this one for you. It could be because the Democrats have very little to gain, and potentially a lot to lose. The Democrats could probably impeach Bush, but at the end of the day, they don't have the votes to remove him from office. So, at the end of the day, Bush will finish out his term. Instead of keeping the focus on the Bush administration and his failed policies, they'll turn the attention onto themselves and their push for impeachment. The full ramifications of their actions may be felt on the next election day when they find the Republican base, not necessarily voting for Republicans, but voting against Democrats because they have an axe to grind.
The Skull and Bones question? Isn't it already assumed Kerry was a member of Skull and Bones, and because it is a, and this is important, a "secret society," members don't really talk about it? I'm sure Meyer was going to tie everything into a nice bow and draw the connections for the audience. Hmmm... Bush and Kerry were both members of Skull and Bones, and because of it, Kerry didn't contest the 2004 Presidential election, and that's also why he won't support impeaching Bush.
Meyer was their to draw attention to himself, not seek answers. I'm glad they cut his mic off and asked him to leave. It potentially left more time for serious questions being asked by others in attendance. If every Andrew Meyer were allowed to ask insipid questions to guest speakers, you'd never get anything meaningful from them.
As for the taser, he essentially asked for it. Had he finished up and asked his questions, he probably wouldn't have been asked to leave. After he was asked to leave, had he done so peacefully, that probably would have been the end of it. He didn't, so the police decided to arrest him. Had he not resisted, he wouldn't have been taken to the ground and eventually tased. "What did I do?" Seems pretty obvious, but I'm sure you believe that's yet another "good question."
Submitted by Guest (not verified) on September 20, 2007 - 12:07am.
A very good question?
This prima donna asked Kerry why he conceded the 2004 Presidential election based on what was written in a book published in 2006. Since you thought it was a good question, I won't assume you'll notice the problem right away. I'll give you a hint, look at the dates.
From there, he makes a nice transition to asking why Kerry isn't pushing to impeach Bush. I'll try to answer this one for you. It could be because the Democrats have very little to gain, and potentially a lot to lose. The Democrats could probably impeach Bush, but at the end of the day, they don't have the votes to remove him from office. So, at the end of the day, Bush will finish out his term. Instead of keeping the focus on the Bush administration and his failed policies, they'll turn the attention onto themselves and their push for impeachment. The full ramifications of their actions may be felt on the next election day when they find the Republican base, not necessarily voting for Republicans, but voting against Democrats because they have an axe to grind.
The Skull and Bones question? Isn't it already assumed Kerry was a member of Skull and Bones, and because it is a, and this is important, a "secret society," members don't really talk about it? I'm sure Meyer was going to tie everything into a nice bow and draw the connections for the audience. Hmmm... Bush and Kerry were both members of Skull and Bones, and because of it, Kerry didn't contest the 2004 Presidential election, and that's also why he won't support impeaching Bush.
Meyer was their to draw attention to himself, not seek answers. I'm glad they cut his mic off and asked him to leave. It potentially left more time for serious questions being asked by others in attendance. If every Andrew Meyer were allowed to ask insipid questions to guest speakers, you'd never get anything meaningful from them.
As for the taser, he essentially asked for it. Had he finished up and asked his questions, he probably wouldn't have been asked to leave. After he was asked to leave, had he done so peacefully, that probably would have been the end of it. He didn't, so the police decided to arrest him. Had he not resisted, he wouldn't have been taken to the ground and eventually tased. "What did I do?" Seems pretty obvious, but I'm sure you believe that's yet another "good question."