Although not clearly defined on his page (as in, it's not something he intends to change), he did say at the debate, and I quote: "You can have both! A Kucinich Administration would fund pre-natal care, post-natal care, a good, solid education. There wouldn't be any need for an abortion. But we can still respect a woman's right to choose!"
And that is a reasoning I can respect. Although a Ron Paul/Kucinich ticket would inevitably be Pro-Life (Ron Paul as a doctor is strongly pro-life and I doubt he'd be willing to allow Kucinich to bargain on that.), the mere fact that Kucinich in his positions stands for appeasing both sides of any arguments something I greatly respect. It's one thing to take a position, but its entirely another to be willing to allow someone else's.
Submitted by Jinno (not verified) on November 18, 2007 - 7:31pm.
Eh, he does have a position on abortion.
Although not clearly defined on his page (as in, it's not something he intends to change), he did say at the debate, and I quote: "You can have both! A Kucinich Administration would fund pre-natal care, post-natal care, a good, solid education. There wouldn't be any need for an abortion. But we can still respect a woman's right to choose!"
And that is a reasoning I can respect. Although a Ron Paul/Kucinich ticket would inevitably be Pro-Life (Ron Paul as a doctor is strongly pro-life and I doubt he'd be willing to allow Kucinich to bargain on that.), the mere fact that Kucinich in his positions stands for appeasing both sides of any arguments something I greatly respect. It's one thing to take a position, but its entirely another to be willing to allow someone else's.