See, the problem you have is your utter hatred. And that's what shows through. You might have more creditability if there was ray of compassion or concern. If you even had the comfort of any admission whatsoever of what the good work that Scientologists do or that there is any workability or benefit in the tech whatsoever.
It so easy for anyone who even just knows a Scientologist to dismiss your rant. They SEE Scientologists caring, and doing good work, and you know that. I love your intellectual "dismantling" of me, but it's a joke. I have far more non-Scientologist friends than not and none of my family are Scientologists. But they know ME and that garners respect for Scientology that all your figure-figure can't dismantle. It really is that simple.
They remember back in the day when I wasn't myself, but rather an introverted kid on drugs (like a lot of my generation) and when they see today that I can love and communicate and help, and be successful, and lead, it just doesn't add up how the reason for that change can be the target of utter contempt and scorn. even if the reason were to be dismissed as MY reason, it still garners respect to the degree that I garner respect through my care toward them. (And no, that's not necessarily by recruiting them into Scn.)
You really ought to temper a little reasonableness in to your own argument, as you proclaim I am unable to do. It would give you more creditability with anyone who knows a Scientologist. But again, I know that's not likely because your purpose is not compassion. It's blind hatred, as old as history.
I'm sorry, but as long as there are decent people on the world who recognize other decent people and come to their defense, (certainly not a given, though - perhaps your last chance) then Scientologists prevail by caring and working with a clean heart to help others.
You'd gain some creditability if you could admit even a portion of that.
And by the way, not to dismiss the earlier argument, come on, you do know there is money behind attacks on Scientology. Well hidden, but not forever. I can tell you that so many journalists, attorneys, professionals in the related fields will tell me that the war with Big Pharma and Scn is so very well known. They understand that, even if they may be fearful or confused to take sides. And certainly the psychotropic dug makers are certainly not one group to take it lying down. One more way to discredit yourself is to pretend that there is NO money from hidden sources used to attack Scientology. People will certainly buy that one.
Lighten up my friend, concede a couple of points here for the sake of your own creditability.
Submitted by Guest (not verified) on February 3, 2008 - 1:46pm.
payroll
Oh how cool, i missed this.
See, the problem you have is your utter hatred. And that's what shows through. You might have more creditability if there was ray of compassion or concern. If you even had the comfort of any admission whatsoever of what the good work that Scientologists do or that there is any workability or benefit in the tech whatsoever.
It so easy for anyone who even just knows a Scientologist to dismiss your rant. They SEE Scientologists caring, and doing good work, and you know that. I love your intellectual "dismantling" of me, but it's a joke. I have far more non-Scientologist friends than not and none of my family are Scientologists. But they know ME and that garners respect for Scientology that all your figure-figure can't dismantle. It really is that simple.
They remember back in the day when I wasn't myself, but rather an introverted kid on drugs (like a lot of my generation) and when they see today that I can love and communicate and help, and be successful, and lead, it just doesn't add up how the reason for that change can be the target of utter contempt and scorn. even if the reason were to be dismissed as MY reason, it still garners respect to the degree that I garner respect through my care toward them. (And no, that's not necessarily by recruiting them into Scn.)
You really ought to temper a little reasonableness in to your own argument, as you proclaim I am unable to do. It would give you more creditability with anyone who knows a Scientologist. But again, I know that's not likely because your purpose is not compassion. It's blind hatred, as old as history.
I'm sorry, but as long as there are decent people on the world who recognize other decent people and come to their defense, (certainly not a given, though - perhaps your last chance) then Scientologists prevail by caring and working with a clean heart to help others.
You'd gain some creditability if you could admit even a portion of that.
And by the way, not to dismiss the earlier argument, come on, you do know there is money behind attacks on Scientology. Well hidden, but not forever. I can tell you that so many journalists, attorneys, professionals in the related fields will tell me that the war with Big Pharma and Scn is so very well known. They understand that, even if they may be fearful or confused to take sides. And certainly the psychotropic dug makers are certainly not one group to take it lying down. One more way to discredit yourself is to pretend that there is NO money from hidden sources used to attack Scientology. People will certainly buy that one.
Lighten up my friend, concede a couple of points here for the sake of your own creditability.