Go hear the interview for yourselves at:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stations/bc/glosslip/2008/04/25/Glosslip-From-Our-Lips-To-Your-Ears

It's fascinating, and an illuminating look into the very heart of the cult.

As for the scientologists posting in response to all these sorts of things - most, if not all, are the products of people working for the Office of Special Affairs, who's job it is to do PR, in addition to implementing the more nefarious tactics such as harassment, blackmail, slander, and many other things, including trying to frame the more prominent critics of scientology for crimes, such as bomb threats.

If a your average scientologist were to visit sites critical of the "church", they would be considered "potential trouble sources" for their association with such material, and would have to pay up for courses to "make it right" again. That's why it is extremely unlikely that any scientologist not specifically directed to comment on anti-scientology stories as a PR exercise would do so on their own.

There's plenty of good information on the web, many sites that have already been suggested by others here, and the thing is, that while scientologists may claim these are lies till they go blue in the face, they cannot make the court documents, recording the criminal activities of Co$ to disappear - neither can they make the words of their founder, in implementing the "fair game" policy, go away.

I mean what credibility can a scientologist have in whatever they say, when their founder instructed them (among other, worse things) to LIE to critics, if that is what it takes.

So no, I do not believe anything coming out of the mouth of a scientologist - it's the policies of your own organization that have led to that.