Ann Coulter Rips on Michelle Obama's Fashion Sense in Latest Book
Having been upstaged in 2008 by The View's Elizabeth Hasselbeck as the crazy conservative that likes to say stupid things about Democrats, Ann Coulter is striking early and hoping to regain her rightful place in 2009. What better a target than the new incoming first lady, Michelle Obama.
In Coulter's new book, Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and their Assault on America, she attacks Michelle Obama's wardrobe. She notes:
"Her obvious imitation of Jackie O's style - the flipped-under hair, the sleeveless A-line dresses, the short strands of fake pearls - would have been laughable if done by anyone other than a media-designated saint."
Cindy McCain, whose husband John failed to win the presidency this past November, does however get Coulter's seal of approval. I can't say this is all that surprising. Coulter says that Cindy "Dressed well without freakishly imitating famous First Ladies in history."
In the book, which drops in bookstores this week, Coulter also snidely refers to Michelle Obama as a "saint" and "Mother Teresa", and suggests that her public service career "advanced in lockstep with the political advancement of her husband." She also refers to president-elect Barack Obama as "B. Hussein Obama", and claims that the media "literally" wanted to have sex with him during the presidential campaign.
Comments
Way'd go, Ann! I can't wait
Way'd go, Ann! I can't wait to read her book. Oh, and BTW, Elizabeth Hasselbeck's got nothing; absolutely nothing, on Ann Coulter. She's a wonderful writer, and I love how the left goes crazy, call her names, but never; ever gives actual acusations, as to her inaccuracies. I've never hear anyone actual site an occassion, where Ann was incorrect. Go, Ann: Go!
Ann Coulter's lack of decency and taste
The bottom feeder is back. A woman who wears black cocktail dresses to morning show interviews... who always looks like she just didn't go home and change after being out all night... really has a lot of nerve going after our new First Lady is such a crass manner. This is further proof she really IS a man, because any woman would know that this is well over the line.
She is a puppet for the neo-cons
Ann Coulter’s book is not outrageous. She is part of the neo-con, zionist machine. Her books are not controversial, they are neo-con wet dreams. Read a book that’s actually been banned like “America Deceived”, not a corporate-approved Coulter ‘novel’. Don’t waste your hard-earned money on Coulter.
Last link (before Google Books bends to gov’t Will and drops the title):
http://www.iuniverse.com/Bookstore/BookDetail.aspx?BookId=SKU-000083883
Hurry! Someone give Ann Coulter a Hug!!
Poor, poor Ann.... did you dream of being First Lady? Did you dream of being ANYTHING other than the hateful cow that you are? Ann Coulter is a pathetic bitter cow and she needs to move to Antarctica where she can read her drivel to the sealions.
Bush committed hate crimes
Speaking of First Lady Michelle Obama:
Michelle Obama is a racial-minority individual, and in her heart and mind she inevitably does not endorse hate crimes committed by George W. Bush.
George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).
George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.
And I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed other hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention.
Many people know what Bush did.
And many people will know what Bush did—even to the end of the world.
Bush was absolute evil.
Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.
Bush is a psychological prisoner.
Bush has a lot to worry about.
Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.
In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.
Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993
“GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG
_____________________
I am not sure where I had read it before, but anyway, it is a linguistically excellent statement, and it goes kind of like this: “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memories so they never got stale and faded.” Oh wait—off the top of my head—I think the quotation came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.
Post new comment